Next Big App

Next Big App

Growth Ritual #94

Selim Yoruk's avatar
Selim Yoruk
Dec 18, 2025
∙ Paid

📋 In This Issue:

  • The “Anti-Funnel” Strategy: How to Slash Refund Requests by 74%

  • The New SEO: “Mention Density” — 🔒

  • The Most Underrated Business Model of 2025: Selling Your Time on the Blockchain — 🔒

  • Is Everyone a CEO Now? Welcome to B2S — 🔒

  • The $10M Solo Business Playbook Stolen from Enterprise SaaS — 🔒


Know someone who’d love this? Invite them and you’ll both win—your friend discovers the newsletter, and you unlock 1 month of premium access.

Refer a friend

IN COLLABORATION WITH RETURN PRIME

The “Anti-Funnel” Strategy: How to Slash Refund Requests by 74%

Every founder I know is obsessed with the “Acquisition Funnel”.

We spend fortunes on ads, SEO, and influencers to get that user through the door. But today, I want to talk about the “Anti-Funnel”, the leaky bucket that quietly drains your revenue while you’re busy looking at your CAC.

I’m talking about returns.

Most businesses treat returns like a crime scene: limit the damage, interrogate the suspect (customer), and clean it up as cheaply as possible.

But I’ve got a case study here that proves the opposite approach works better. This isn’t just about “customer service”; it’s about revenue retention mechanics.

The “Anti-Funnel” Trap

Here is the brutal truth: If you are running a product business, especially in something like fashion, scaling sales usually means scaling headaches.

Take Bummer, a leading D2C innerwear brand. They were killing it with quirky designs and sustainable fabrics. But as their sales soared, their operations hit a wall.

Their returns process was manual. We are talking about four customer support reps and a warehouse team spending four collective hours every single day just managing returns.

They were drowning in:

  • Operational Overheads: Diverting resources from growth to damage control.

  • Logistics Nightmares: Manual approvals and endless follow-ups with logistics partners.

  • Customer Friction: Slow processes erode trust. If I have to fight you to return a pair of boxers, I’m never buying from you again.

This is the classic “Scaling Trap”. You double your sales, but you triple your operational drag.

The Contrarian Take: Friction is the Enemy, Not the Return

The standard advice is “make returns hard so people don’t do it”. That is wrong.

Bummer flipped the script. They implemented Return Prime to automate the chaos.

The result?

They didn’t just save time; they fundamentally changed user behavior.

Here are the numbers that matter:

  • 74% Reduction in Return Requests.

  • 87.5% Faster Return Management.

  • NPS Score of 8.5 (smashing industry benchmarks).

Wait, how do you reduce return requests by making returns easier?

This is the genius part. By using Return Prime’s “Smart Exchange Recommendation”, Bummer nudged customers toward exchanges instead of refunds.

When the process is seamless (self-serve, instant logic), the customer doesn’t panic and demand cash back. They are happy to swap for a better size or color.

Bummer shifted the focus from “giving money back” to “getting the right product in the customer’s hands”.

The Execution: From “White Book” to Reality

In my Product Growth Playbook (The White Book), I talk extensively about the “Scaling” stage. You cannot scale manual labor linearly with revenue. It breaks.

Bummer’s transition is a textbook execution of this principle:

  1. Automation over Headcount: They went from 4 people spending 4 hours a day to 2 people spending 2 hours.

  2. Scalability Test: During peak sales, order volume jumped 2x-3x, and the system handled it without the warehouse team breaking a sweat.

  3. Logistics Integration: Instead of manual emails, Return Prime synced directly with logistics providers to auto-generate labels and pickups.

This turned a “4-hour daily meeting” into a background process.

The Vision: Future-Proofing with Upsells

Looking at this through the lens of my AI Entrepreneur’s Guide (The Black Book), the future of returns isn’t just automation, it’s conversion.

Bummer is now looking to activate Return Prime’s “Upsell Feature”.

Think about it: The moment a customer is returning an item is a high-intent touchpoint.

Instead of just swapping a size, what if the system says: “Hey, since you’re exchanging this, want to add these socks for 20% off?”

Return Prime estimates this can drive an 8% revenue uplift. That is literally creating money out of a process that used to just cost money.

The Takeaway

If you are building a D2C brand or an e-commerce tool, stop looking at returns as a “cost center”. It is a touchpoint.

If you create friction, you get refunds and churn. If you create flow, you get exchanges and loyalty.

Next Step for You: Audit your “Anti-Funnel”. Go through your own return process today. If it takes more than 3 clicks or requires an email to a human, you are leaving retention on the table.

If you want to replicate Bummer’s 74% reduction in refund requests, check out Return Prime. It’s a no-brainer for automated logistics and smart exchanges.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Next Big App · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture